top of page

Create Your First Project

Start adding your projects to your portfolio. Click on "Manage Projects" to get started

Evaluation of Alternative Voice Picking Solutions

Project Overview

_

➤ Category

Systems, Process & Digital Optimization

➤ KPIs (Acceptance Criteria)

[ • ] Project delivered within planned deadline
[ • ] 1 pilot site prepared for testing
[ • ] Potential TCO reduction

• [SITUATION]:
As part of a company-wide Operational Excellence and Cost Reduction program, this project aimed to evaluate alternative voice-picking technologies for warehouse order preparation.
The existing market-leading system offered high reliability and robustness, but its acquisition and maintenance costs were increasingly difficult to sustain - especially since a large share of the device fleet was damaged and required replacement, posing operational risks for several distribution centers.

• [TASK]:
As Logistics Solutions Manager, I was responsible for identifying alternative technologies with lower total cost of ownership (TCO), conducting a comparative study, and presenting a recommendation to senior management on whether to replace or maintain the current system.

• [ACTION]:
➢ I established a structured evaluation plan with clear milestones and deadlines.
➢ After conducting market research, I engaged with an Italian vendor offering a cost-effective voice-picking solution that emulated voice commands on Android smartphones through a middleware compatible with any WMS. This setup significantly reduced equipment and maintenance costs while maintaining the same functional logic as the incumbent solution.
➢ I coordinated with Procurement, IT, and Operations teams to gather technical and financial data, validate integration requirements, and prepare a feasibility study including cost-benefit and risk analysis.
➢ A pilot implementation was prepared for one DC to test operational robustness and system performance under real conditions.

• [RESULT]:
➢ The final report presented a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative comparison between the two technologies, including TCO analysis and risk assessment.
➢ Although the new solution showed a potential TCO reduction and strong scalability advantages, the executive board decided not to proceed with the technology switch, mainly due to corporate IT alignment requirements and global system standardization constraints.

bottom of page